OFFENSIVE SECURITY SERVICES

Security testing based on real attack paths.

Volkano provides authorized penetration testing, security assessments, and red team exercises for web, API, cloud, identity, and digital asset environments.

Request an assessmentReview capabilities
Testing begins only after written authorization, confirmed scope, and agreed rules of engagement.
AUTHORIZED ENGAGEMENT Scope controlled
Scope lockedEvidence loggedImpact explained
AUTHORIZED TESTINGREALISTIC VALIDATIONACTIONABLE REPORTINGREMEDIATION SUPPORT

SECURITY ASSESSMENTS

Validate exposure. Prioritize remediation.

A useful assessment does more than list possible weaknesses. It shows how an attacker could move through the environment, what the path exposes, and which fix changes the outcome.

Each engagement has an agreed objective and rules of engagement. We combine targeted tooling with analyst-led review, validate findings before reporting them, and preserve the evidence your team needs to reproduce and remediate each issue.

Risk-led

Testing follows credible paths to business-relevant assets and actions.

Evidence-led

Reported issues include context and evidence, not unverified scanner output.

Remediation-led

Findings give engineering and security teams clear steps to act.

CAPABILITIES

Focused testing across the paths attackers use.

Scope can cover one application or a connected attack path across external exposure, identity, cloud, and critical workflows.

Penetration testing

Analyst-led testing of agreed systems and applications to verify exploitable weaknesses, practical impact, and the controls that stop an attack from progressing.

Manual validationAttack pathsControl testing

Red team exercises

Objective-led adversary simulation across technology, identity, and operational controls. Every exercise runs under explicit authorization and defined rules of engagement.

Adversary simulationDetection feedbackPurple-team option

Web and API security

Focused assessment of application logic, authentication, authorization, sessions, data exposure, integrations, and abuse paths across web and API surfaces.

Web applicationsAPIsBusiness logic

Cloud and identity

Review of cloud configurations, trust relationships, permissions, secrets, and identity flows to test how an initial foothold could lead to broader access.

Cloud postureIAM pathsPrivilege boundaries

Exposure validation

Validation of externally visible assets and suspected exposures, followed by controlled attack-path analysis that separates reachable risk from background noise.

Attack surfaceExposure reviewPath validation

Digital asset security

Scoped review of wallet and exchange-adjacent workflows, digital asset infrastructure, and smart contract integrations. Blockchain forensics can support incident-related work.

Wallet workflowsWeb3 integrationsForensic support

ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

Controlled from scope through retesting.

Clear boundaries protect both sides of the engagement. The work remains traceable from authorization through remediation.

  1. Scope

    Define the systems, objectives, constraints, stakeholders, and evidence required from the engagement.

  2. Authorization

    Confirm written authorization, rules of engagement, testing windows, escalation contacts, and prohibited actions.

  3. Reconnaissance

    Map the agreed attack surface and identify credible paths through applications, infrastructure, and identity.

  4. Controlled validation

    Test vulnerabilities and attack paths carefully, preserving useful evidence while limiting operational impact.

  5. Reporting

    Document validated findings, reproduction steps, affected assets, context, impact, and remediation priorities.

  6. Remediation

    Review practical fixes with engineering and security stakeholders, including compensating controls where needed.

  7. Retesting

    Recheck agreed findings after remediation and record whether the original attack path is closed or materially reduced.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A report your teams can use.

Deliverables separate executive context from technical detail. Leaders see exposure and priority; practitioners get the evidence needed to reproduce, fix, and retest.

  • Executive summary for business and security leadership
  • Technical findings with affected assets and supporting evidence
  • Clear reproduction steps and attack-path context
  • Impact and severity assessment tied to the environment
  • Prioritized remediation recommendations
  • Technical debrief with the teams responsible for remediation
  • Retest results when validation is included in scope
ASSESSMENT REPORTVALIDATED FINDING
FINDING / 01

Attack path and business impact

Affected surface Evidence reference Severity context
REMEDIATION
Evidence preservedOwner readyRetest eligible

ENVIRONMENTS

Coverage matched to the system at risk.

Not every technique belongs in every engagement. During scoping, we select coverage based on architecture, threat model, operational constraints, and the decisions the assessment must support.

SaaS and web applications

Customer-facing products, administrative surfaces, critical workflows, and application authorization boundaries.

WEB · BUSINESS LOGIC · ACCESS CONTROL

APIs and integrations

Public and private APIs, service-to-service trust, third-party integrations, and data authorization paths.

REST · GRAPHQL · INTEGRATIONS

Cloud environments

Cloud configuration, exposed services, secrets, permissions, control-plane access, and lateral movement paths.

CLOUD · IAM · WORKLOADS

Identity and access flows

Authentication, account recovery, session handling, privilege transitions, and organizational trust boundaries.

IDENTITY · SSO · PRIVILEGE

Digital asset systems

Wallet operations, blockchain-facing services, custody-adjacent workflows, and supporting transaction evidence.

WEB3 · WALLETS · TRANSACTIONS

START WITH THE SCOPE

Tell us what needs to be tested.

Share the environment, objective, and timing. We will help define an authorized engagement with clear boundaries and useful deliverables.

Request an assessmentinfo@volkano.io